รายงานทั้งหมด
รายงาน Terra Nova
#115882: "Add Faction Bans / Fast Auction or Both"
#115882: "Add Faction Bans / Fast Auction or Both"
รายงานนี้เกี่ยวกับอะไร?
เกิดอะไรขึ้น? กรุณาเลือกจากด้านล่าง
คำแนะนำ: ในความคิดของฉันต่อไปนี้จะช่วยปรับปรุงการใช้งานเกม
เกิดอะไรขึ้น? กรุณาเลือกจากด้านล่าง
คำแนะนำ: ในความคิดของฉันต่อไปนี้จะช่วยปรับปรุงการใช้งานเกม
โปรดตรวจสอบว่ามีรายงานในหัวข้อเดียวกันอยู่แล้ว
ถ้าใช่โปรดโหวตสำหรับรายงานนี้ รายงานที่ได้รับคะแนนโหวตมากที่สุดจะได้รับลำดับความสำคัญสูง!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
คำอธิบายโดยละเอียด
• โปรดคัดลอก / วางข้อความแสดงข้อผิดพลาดที่คุณเห็นบนหน้าจอหากมี
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• โปรดอธิบายสิ่งที่คุณต้องการจะทำสิ่งที่คุณทำและสิ่งที่เกิดขึ้น
• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• โปรดคัดลอก / วางข้อความที่แสดงเป็นภาษาอังกฤษแทนภาษาของคุณ หากคุณมีภาพหน้าจอของข้อบกพร่องนี้ (แนวปฏิบัติที่ดี) คุณสามารถใช้ Imgur.com เพื่ออัปโหลดและคัดลอก / วางลิงค์ที่นี่
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• ข้อความนี้มีอยู่ใน ระบบการแปล หรือไม่? ถ้าใช่มันแปลมานานกว่า 24 ชั่วโมงแล้วหรือยัง?
• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• โปรดอธิบายข้อเสนอแนะของคุณอย่างแม่นยำและรัดกุมเพื่อให้ง่ายที่สุดที่จะเข้าใจสิ่งที่คุณหมายถึง
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• สิ่งที่ปรากฏบนหน้าจอเมื่อคุณถูกบล็อก (หน้าจอว่างเปล่าส่วนหนึ่งของอินเตอร์เฟซเกมข้อความผิดพลาด?)
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• ส่วนใดของกฎที่ไม่ได้รับความเคารพจากการปรับตัวด้วย BGA
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• การละเมิดกฎสามารถมองเห็นได้ในการเล่นซ้ำเกมหรือไม่ ถ้าใช่จะย้ายเบอร์ไหน
• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• แอคชั่นเกมใดที่คุณอยากใช้งาน?
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• คุณพยายามทำอะไรเพื่อกระตุ้นการกระทำของเกมนี้?
• เกิดอะไรขึ้นเมื่อคุณพยายามทำสิ่งนี้ (ข้อความแสดงข้อผิดพลาดข้อความแถบสถานะของเกม ... )?
• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• ปัญหาเกิดขึ้นที่ขั้นตอนใดของเกม (คำสั่งเกมปัจจุบันคืออะไร)
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• เกิดอะไรขึ้นเมื่อคุณพยายามทำการกระทำของเกม (ข้อความแสดงข้อผิดพลาดข้อความแถบสถานะเกม, ... )
• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• โปรดอธิบายปัญหาการแสดงผล หากคุณมีภาพหน้าจอของข้อบกพร่องนี้ (แนวปฏิบัติที่ดี) คุณสามารถใช้ Imgur.com เพื่ออัปโหลดและคัดลอก / วางลิงค์ที่นี่
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• โปรดคัดลอก / วางข้อความที่แสดงเป็นภาษาอังกฤษแทนภาษาของคุณ หากคุณมีภาพหน้าจอของข้อบกพร่องนี้ (แนวปฏิบัติที่ดี) คุณสามารถใช้ Imgur.com เพื่ออัปโหลดและคัดลอก / วางลิงค์ที่นี่
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• ข้อความนี้มีอยู่ใน ระบบการแปล หรือไม่? ถ้าใช่มันแปลมานานกว่า 24 ชั่วโมงแล้วหรือยัง?
• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
• โปรดอธิบายข้อเสนอแนะของคุณอย่างแม่นยำและรัดกุมเพื่อให้ง่ายที่สุดที่จะเข้าใจสิ่งที่คุณหมายถึง
Terra Nova is an incredibly balanced game. I do believe it has by far the best balance in this family of games, however it can always get better.
My suggestion is to do one of 3 things as options in the game:
1. Implement faction bans in player order (in planner variant those go after the initial placement of neutral faction)
2. Gaia project style fast auction
3. Both
I know the rules for that are not in the rulebook, but neither are there in the Gaia Project and yet they are available on the website. The birthplace of that options was a request like this one, so hopefully we can get this done. Link to Gaia Project request: boardgamearena.com/bug?id=52587 and relevant information after it has been implemented:
"Happy Saturday morning. We've completed the implementation of new features that include banning, drafting, and auctions. We've also been in touch with the publisher to receive approval of these optional features.[..]"
I do believe fast auction would be more suited to the game than the standard Terra Mystica style auction.
We've played dozens of in house games with bans between top players and it works really, really well. Auction has been tried & tested for a long time in other games and bans have been tried & tested in Gaia Project.• คุณใช้เบราว์เซอร์อะไร?
Google Chrome v121
ประวัติการรายงาน
ก.พ. 27 th 2024 14:14 • Wonderful Plays • ข้อเสนอแนะนี้ยังไม่ได้รับการวิเคราะห์โดยนักพัฒนา:
I do believe contacting the publisher would be necessary, I can do that myself if developers don't have any direct line to them.
Thanks to the developers for their hard work so far on this stellar implementation, my wish is to only get this even better so more people can enjoy this great game and it can get the respect it deserves! :)
Thanks to the developers for their hard work so far on this stellar implementation, my wish is to only get this even better so more people can enjoy this great game and it can get the respect it deserves! :)
ก.พ. 29 th 2024 12:52 • gratpoil • ข้อเสนอแนะนี้ยังไม่ได้รับการวิเคราะห์โดยนักพัฒนา:
I totally agree, with a preference for auctions. I think it would encourage more good players of Terra mystica and Gaia project to get involve in the competitive community of Terra Nova. Because this game have the potential to become a great competitive game with auctions.
มี.ค. 9 th 2024 22:56 • Wonderful Plays • ข้อเสนอแนะนี้ยังไม่ได้รับการวิเคราะห์โดยนักพัฒนา:
Adding 2 games were we simulated Fast Auction in the chat:
boardgamearena.com/table?table=485203548 (-5 for the winner Inventors)
boardgamearena.com/table?table=485207151 (-3 for the winner Sand Cats)
I have plenty of replays for the bans as well if needed, played against top players.
boardgamearena.com/table?table=485203548 (-5 for the winner Inventors)
boardgamearena.com/table?table=485207151 (-3 for the winner Sand Cats)
I have plenty of replays for the bans as well if needed, played against top players.
เม.ย. 2 nd 2024 14:55 • Ghostly 1 • ข้อเสนอแนะนี้ยังไม่ได้รับการวิเคราะห์โดยนักพัฒนา:
If this was just auction, I would vote for it.
ส.ค. 15 th 2024 17:38 • Phoxtrot • ข้อเสนอแนะนี้ยังไม่ได้รับการวิเคราะห์โดยนักพัฒนา:
For me, the biggest balance problem isn't the faction in itself.
It's having 0, 1 or 2 opponents playing an adjacent color.
So I don't think that the TM auction is actually the best to balance as you are bidding without necessarily knowing how many adjacent colors will be played to each of the popular factions.
So I would prefer that the colors to be played are chosen randomly (1 per player) and then players bid for those colors. And I guess we might as well link turn order with the faction.
This way, you know how difficult it will be to get those territories for each faction.
It's having 0, 1 or 2 opponents playing an adjacent color.
So I don't think that the TM auction is actually the best to balance as you are bidding without necessarily knowing how many adjacent colors will be played to each of the popular factions.
So I would prefer that the colors to be played are chosen randomly (1 per player) and then players bid for those colors. And I guess we might as well link turn order with the faction.
This way, you know how difficult it will be to get those territories for each faction.
เพิ่มการร้องเรียน
โปรดเพิ่มอะไรก็ได้ที่เกี่ยวข้องในการทำซ้ำข้อผิดพลาดนี้หรือทำความเข้าใจกับข้อเสนอแนะของคุณ:
- ID ของโต๊ะอื่น / ID ของตาเดิน
- การกด F5 แก้ไขปัญหาหรือไม่
- ปัญหาเกิดขึ้นหลายครั้งหรือไม่ ทุกเวลา? สุ่ม?
- หากคุณมีภาพหน้าจอของข้อบกพร่องนี้ (แนวปฏิบัติที่ดี) คุณสามารถใช้ Imgur.com เพื่ออัปโหลดและคัดลอก / วางลิงค์ที่นี่
เปลี่ยนสถานะรายงานเป็น:
bug?id=115882
